![]() Its successor, Apple M2, was announced on Jat WWDC. The M1 was followed by the professional-focused M1 Pro and M1 Max chips in 2021. The M1 Max is a higher-powered version of the M1 Pro, with more GPU cores and memory bandwidth and a larger die size. Apple introduced the M1 Ultra in 2022, combining two M1 Max chips in one package. These chips differ largely in size and the number of functional units: for example, while the original M1 has about 16 billion transistors, the M1 Ultra has 114 billion.Īpple's macOS and iPadOS operating systems both run on the M1. Initial support for the M1 SoC in the Linux kernel was released in version 5.13 on June 27, 2021. The initial versions of the M1 chips contain an architectural defect that permits sandboxed applications to exchange data, violating the security model, an issue that has been described as "mostly harmless". 3 Products that use the Apple M1 series.Click to expand.I agree with you to some extent. My software company is now almost 35 years old. I use to get complaints about the software being too complicated so at one point I decided to stop documenting features that I thought would be useful for some customers but not all customers until a customer ask for them and then I could have them simply set a flag. Maybe a power user setting(s) from the terminal window would satisfy everyone. Kind of like the settings that TinkerTools is able to exploit.Īnd at the same time they could add some simple ones and not make it too complicated. Example: You can create a New Folder but you can not create a New File within a folder without opening up the application first. Would be nice to be able to create a New Text File like you can create a New Folder. ![]() Simple stuff like that would not be that hard. Another would be to have other sort options. Like sorting folders to the top of the list. These things are in third party Finder Replacements so seems like some people like them.įor me there are more things about the Mac that I like over Windows and I don't want to use these third party replacements so I simply have to deal with it. But just saying they could add some of the more obvious things. I really wish they'd give the Finder some more attention even if you heavily use iCloud for storage and the new capabilities/UI for Spotlight, you still need to go into the Finder from time to time. ![]() I've automated most tasks involving my NAS using rsync, simply because the Finder sometimes locks up so often when an AFP/NFS/SMB share is mounted.Īpple could make an amazing Finder update by doing three things: It's just disappointing how unrefined it still is, nothing is particularly quick to do and the performance of the Finder when dealing with remote mounts (or even a NAS on a gigabit network) can be nothing short of horrific. Search as you Type - switching effectively a new window for search is a horrible way to do it, we need a LaunchPad style in-window search. Process per Window - with all the remote services out there this is something we should really have had for ages it's simply inexcusable that a single Finder window viewing a slow shared volume should be able to lock up all other windows.Īfter all, typing a name in a Finder window is just so you can find a particular item anyway, but in larger folders it doesn't usually get you much closer to the item you want anyway, so a quick search would be much better, especially with the option to prevent searching of sub-folders (currently I don't think this is possible with Spotlight? Not without filtering the results anyway).Performance in general needs to be improved, with quick look previews generated properly in the background, rather than sometimes locking up the Finder (again, particularly with slower shared volumes). DS_Store juggling was an annoyance from day one of OS X, and one we've been stuck with ever since we're still stuck with view options that no-one fully understands and which half the time don't act the way you want them to. ![]() Navigated to a folder using an open/save dialogue? You've probably just screwed up your view options. Viewed a different folder with custom view settings then gone back to view a different folder in the same window? You've probably screwed up your view options. Really we just need a sensible, intuitive system, ideally with clear inheritance, so if I set all ~/Pictures to display in overflow mode then all sub-folders will display that way too unless one of them overrides that behaviour. If I set default for Macintosh HD then these are the defaults for all folders unless overridden with a different grid spacing or whatever. Data stored in some kind of database rather than.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |